#AAP : The Emotional Overeach Ominously Continues

—  Concluded —

It’s already getting a little tiring, with usual faux pas and evidence of ugly clay-footedness of those who has been tom-tommed as incorruptible and presented as usherers of radical departure in Indian politics, but the relevance of the latest political development is assuming a seriously sombre spectre. Not because of the new political kids on the block per se but on account of how they have been lapped up by big-money subversionists fronted by Ford Foundation and how these personally ambitious have been co-opted by the mother of corruption Congress Party. The danger is compounded by perfectly well-meaning people who would not admit to their poor judgement and get off their emotional momentum even when faced with evidence of AAP — Common Man’s Party — being without any leadership quality or character, capability or competence.

There are tell-a-tale signs of AAP leaders being launched proper into the clique that expects to “rule” the country, that links seamlessly with the international coterie which has inherited the colonialist’s mantle for power over third world countries. The foil is perfect in the midst of emotional “idiots” willing to suspend their discrimination and critical eye. Unfortunately, democracy and federal structure permits social divisions emotionally charged in the name of historical, regional, lingual and devised causes. Economic under-development becomes imperative to these “invisible” forces at work; it keeps national unity quite an obscure concern for the vast majority who remain too poor and un-empowered to think of themselves as one, 1.2 billion strong people.

Its business at usual : corruption will remain, but for cosmetic perception; money stashed abroad will continue to increase to be brought in whenever intervetions are required; the semblence of democracy will exist as a charade, without a unifying national consciousness. 

AAP phenomenon is a blip before the global oligarchy at work. The real danger is the home-grown BJP and its well-received leader, Narendra Modi !

AAP leaders have been fond of taking turns and fonder still of taking U-turns. The sinister developments of late have a convergence of well-marked anti-India, pro-jihadist intellectuals and people supportive of insurgents into its fold. The everyday flip-flops were bad enough; but the absence of any emphasis on governance and scant regard to promises made to the public is loud and unnerving.

How about governance ?
Roads, new schools n colleges, buses, emergency services, water bodies …

People supportive of the new outfit, the “useful idiots” who have no idea of the future misery they are uleashing today, have gone on to question the psychology behind those who have publicly expressed thei doubts. How about capability by evidence from past, character by consistency between speech and action, and performance from D1 in office … as criteria ?

Surajit Dasgopta, who spent time in close proximity, writes about AAP supremo Arvind Kejriwal :”In the mornings that I spent with Kejriwal having breakfast at his house, in the long drives where I would be in a car with him, over the dinners that I had with him, in the corner room of the IaC and AAP’s office at Kaushambi, Ghaziabad, I realized this man actually did not mean that he hated to be dogmatic, andhence did not want to commit himself to any ideology. Actually, this man was too intellectually challenged to be able to fathom any philosophy of governance. You raise the issue, and he would instantly get irritated. “मुझे इस पर बात ही नहीं करनी! (I just don’t want to talk about it)” was his standard response.

“In a morning of November 2012 when we were busy discussing the launching event slated for the 26th of the month, I was witness to Kejriwal dismissing a young woman from the Nav Bharat Party like that. The poor, energetic, young lady was trying to impress upon him the virtue of individual liberty and a free market.

Paraphrasing what Kejriwal said to the young woman in Hindi, I quote him: “I have seen a lot of governments. None is either left or right. They are all centrist. As and when we make a government, we have to toe more or less the same line.” This dismissive remark exposes two things. One, he simply does not know the subject he is speaking about. Two, he is going to offer India nothing new.”

It might be good to recall that we all gave the same, “Come, looks honest, speaks well. will do some good,” when Rajiv Gandhi and Manmohan Singh came on board. Then we wondered why it all turned out to be exponentially worse than before ? Perhaps, Deming’s by now proven and accepted theory would explain … It’s the system that matters, not individuals. Arvind Kejriwal and his AAP has come a long way from where he started and is now a part of the same matrix !

Amidst news of admittance of history-sheeters and general elections in another 3-4 months, I found suggestons of going slow on voicing my concerns unacceptable … The trouble with ignoring the tell-a-tale signs was that we’ll have to live with compounded damages for the next 5 years ! In my assessment, it was not AAP but Narendra Modi of BJP who was the real outsider here, who is also strong and resourceful enough to usher in a totally different kind of politics anchored in Nation First, Zero Corruption, People-Centered Bureaucracy and Development… all of which has been in utter contempt of successive government regimes since long.

There was one more reason why I trusted @narendramodi !
His intimate familiarity with Vivekananda… and his vision, in which the nation is always held as the first.

vs the AAP upstart who says, ” we don’t have a vision but our intent is good.”

What is intent without a vision, in the context of public administration ?

When AAP well-wishers cringed at well-reasoned criticism, it was expected. But when they pleaded for lenient view of facts unfolding before us, they also projected a presumed “error” on part of critics. I wondered why it is difficult for AAP supporters to appreciate that there could be people out there who might have lesser tolerance to mere emotional appeals and tall promises, and who might insist on consistency and accountability at highest levels of public administration if only because it is so very important for our country and our countrymen. The highest political offices were no nursery or training ground for novices.

So when the country’s first women IPS who had set matter to better course wherever she’d been placed, Kiran Bedi, came out in support of BJP and Narendra Modi, I understood her decision.Time and again, Modi has laid out a vision for the country’s future that has been well-received by the industry and people at large. He has actually implemented such a time bound plan for his home state, with special focus in areas most neglected — girl education, women empowerment, solar power, civic amenities. The Party itself was better organised, completely republican, nationalist to core, and with more qualified and experienced team by far. The recent assembly elections showed to great extent how wide its appeal was among the people. Even in Delhi, where its performce was least impressive, AAP undercut the Congress Party base in the main. The latter of course was completely rejected by the voting public.

I chose an opportunity to lay out my understanding and stance to an AAP supporter in these words :

01 AAP came on a plank of radical departure. Now, you having to urge that what they are doing has always been done is a pathetic admission of things being same as before… that far from anything radically different from past, the AAP represents business as usual.02 But of course, it’s never “the usual” or the same with matters like reservation and subsidy; it is always worsening the situation, exponentially, by the day : the economics of poverty, in which people receive doles to waste on alchohol or consume and excrete and never the any better, beyond their subsistence level of existence.

So too, with reservations : the politics of scarcity. I see it not only ineffective and ugly, it is also immorally discriminatory and hence unconstitutional. How can the State discriminate in as basic a need as survival and livelihood ? Is the other person in the same economic level, with comparable dire wants, any the less worthy of survival and livelihood opportunity ?

Now, if AAP is pursuing what is done by present and previous governments, then we expect it to extend the same immoral and unonstitutional measures into law and order and judicial areas, too ! The present Union Home Minister is on record in this regard : deal leniently with crimes done by minorities; set up separate courts for them. Is that also to be expected from AAP ?

03 In a worsening scenario, shall we be extending such special treatment in the case of defence and emergency services ! Defend the minorities first; save the minorities first. Is that what you will be defending next ?

If you’ve missed it, in drummed up din of the media and prejudiced catcalls, the BJP has at least tried, and States which it governs are actually implementing with spectacular success : an economic political policy defined by abundance. All of them provide cheap enough but payable water and electric supply services ! In warped and twisted environment established by successive Congress govts, that seems pretty much radical to me.

That is what I understood, I reported  …Politics Of Scarcity-002

No, I am not going to lynch anyone publicly.
There would be too many … who’ve been fooled by #AAP !
But why wouldn’t people remember :
EVERYBODY has feet of clay. The one who makes no attempt to hide that could indeed be a friend ! The one who does can only con you and, in fact, is a demon in the making. We’ve seen too many by now …
Then, true enough, came on air someone who knew what he was talking about : serious, damning and categorical ! The former R&AW intelligence officer deemed AAP pro-jihadi and anti-national, executing a script extended by inimical quarters in Pakistan, publicly challenging AAP and its leader Prashant Bhushan to take him to court on that !
And Medha Patkar lent her support to to AAP … She was one who was discussing with a US citizen, in the business of channelling international funding and dishing out awards to pliant “leaders” with capacity for stalling development projects in the country, how she had influence amongst the judiciary !

And Ford Foundation was common to both Medha Patkar and Arvind Kejriwal…

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s