Of course not, but the point made was as follows :
If women go for vaginaplasty or other ‘lotions’ to tighten up the vulva to please the men or themselves, or go for younger ‘studs’ to literally fill themselves up, they actually are underscoring the value of size, the rub, and virility or hotness of vitality for themselves …
Which is fine in itself, for themselves. Except that it is not. For, why then is the society shocked or hold men guilty when they go for their preference for size and softness, when they fall for younger gals or have mistresses, or when 60 year old Saudis marry 10 – 12 year olds ( it’s legal in their country ), or when 1% of men can’t contain their desire overdrive ( any statistical distribution curve would be their alibi ) and grab girls in manner they legally should not… such as kidnap, molestation or rape ?
I have to agree that ‘women’s lib’ trend should allow women the same statistical allowance for some of them to kidnap, molest or rape men.
But, of course, I find myself covered with stupidity :
Society rightly want men to desist; but from how it’s going, by the time men reform or even before, women would need to be handed the same advice, to “desist.” Untill there is no one to advise or listen.
Would the wiser ones, especially women, clarify the argument ?
For me, the issue might start with men or women, or both, but its resolution must end in the family. Anything, act or value, that harms the family, breaks or erodes trust, or creates an unbridgeable distance, should be unacceptable … inelectable, howsoever pleasureable or legal it be, or legitimate and right it may seem !